But he could have Sen. Joe Manchin standing in his way.
The West Virginia Democrat told CNN that he would oppose his party’s effort to get rid of the filibuster, a stall tactic frequently used by the Senate’s minority party and that requires 60 votes in the chamber to overcome.
“That’s bullshit,” Manchin said this week when asked about the Democratic push to eliminate the filibuster. He noted that he opposed the Democratic effort in 2013 to eliminate the filibuster on most presidential nominees. “And I would be opposed to it again.”
“The whole intention of Congress is basically to have a little bit of compromise with the other side,” Manchin said. “Our job is to find common and cooling ground, if you will, to make something work that makes sense.”
Manchin’s opposition is not insignificant.
To change the rules by using the so-called “nuclear option,” Democrats will need 51 votes. But any Democratic majority in the next Senate will almost certainly be extremely narrow, meaning that losing one or two votes could be enough to scuttle the effort.
Other Democrats are also uncertain whether they would join forces to change the rules, worried that doing so would forever change a body meant to build consensus into one nearly identical to the majority-rules House.
Alabama Sen. Doug Jones, a Democrat who would have to win his tough reelection bid this fall to return next Congress, told CNN he is also opposed to changing the rules to allow legislation to advance on a straight-party vote.
“I think we have to continue to maintain the institutions of the Senate, and the filibuster has long since been an important part of that for the minority, and I would not favor getting rid of that,” Jones said, calling such a move a “slippery slope.”
On Thursday, two other Democrats also indicated they weren’t in favor of eliminating the stall tactic.
“I’ve spoken about this many times before — and I do not believe we should take away the filibuster,” said Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.
Sen. Jon Tester of Montana said “I am a no” on changing the filibuster, saying: “The move to make the Senate like the House, I think it’s a mistake.” But he suggested he potentially could change his mind if the GOP were to “stonewall, stonewall, stonewall.”
“I’ll give them more credit than that and say they’re not going to do that; that’s why I wouldn’t throw it away,” Tester told CNN.
Indeed, the debate over eliminating the filibuster has been brewing for years in the institution, which has only intensified under Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and his Democratic majority eliminated the 60-vote filibuster threshold for presidential nominees in 2013 other than for the Supreme Court, prompting howls of protest from Republicans.
Under the existing rules, senators have to win significant bipartisan support to get legislation through the slow-moving body. That means for any policy measure — whether it’s Biden’s ambitions on health care, climate change or immigration — there must be 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. And if Democrats retake the majority, most believe they will have an extremely narrow advantage or may even control a 50-50 Senate.
But given the highly polarized body, most believe that no major legislation would move through in a Biden presidency, which is why calls are growing to eliminate the filibuster’s 60-vote threshold altogether.
Dems The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2020 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.
